Monday, June 27, 2022

Classical Era: Revolution and Art in the 1700s

    During the 1700s both the French and English countries went through revolutions. The drastic changes made during this period greatly influenced the art being produced at the time. Artistically and commercially, America was isolated for a long period due to the Revolution. There was little artwork created as the battles raged, and artists left to study abroad. Once Independence from Britain came, America, as a new country with a young generation, became very patriotic and their art demonstrated it.    

     Many paintings, illustrations, and other art reflected victorious battle scenes, and the building of a new, determined country. In addition to printed art, the patriotism flowed through the streets, as well as inside homes with flags, bald eagles, and national seals being proudly displayed (Met Museum). Neoclassical designs also started to make an appearance in architecture, giving rise to the "antique" cabinetry we still see in America today (Met Museum). The three pieces of art I've chosen for this blog are related to the American Revolution, specifically in the New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania areas where many of the historical events took place. 


Penn's Treaty with the Indians, Benjamin West 1771-72. 

    Penn's Treaty, sometimes known as the Treaty of Shackamaxon was signed in 1682. This was a treaty between William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania, and Tamanend of the Lenape tribe (History101). William Penn was a Quaker who wanted to settle on native land but still treat them respectfully and share the land use. This idea soon faded as colonists became greedy and ownership of land was a very divided topic. The role of Native Americans was crucial to the colonies and even changed the way wars were fought, as the Native Americans taught the colonists new tactics in small battles. A fact I found surprising was that most of the Native Americans that chose to participate in the revolution, fought on the side of the Crown (Battlefields). The British wanted to restrict land settlements, while settlers wanted to continue to expand, encroaching on Native Territories. 
    This piece by Benjamin West shows a peaceful scene along the Delaware River, with discussions between Penn and the Lenape. In the background, you can see new settlements being constructed, as well as teepee-like structures to the right, suggesting the sharing of land and harmonious coexistence. The colonists are seen presenting gifts of fabric, while the natives have laid their weapons down. There are several characters in the painting with open arms, also suggesting a welcoming feel. While I do enjoy the warmness of this piece, I do not think I would own it.
    The painting was commissioned by Thomas Penn, the son of William Penn. West was also a Quaker and used a neoclassical style for this piece to suggest harmony (Pafa). West was born in Pennsylvania but eventually moved to London where he was appointed official history painter by King George III. Benjamin West never returned to the colonies, but he claimed he learned color mixing from the Native Americans which I find very interesting.




Vue de la Nouvelle Yorck, Balthasar Friedrich Leizelt, 1775

    The German artist Balthasar Friedrich Leizelt created this engraving of New York Harbor in 1775. I felt this is an important piece of art for the period as it shows merchants and trade ships in the harbor which were responsible for a very large portion of the goods coming to the colonies. In August of 1776, British forces invaded Manhattan Island and defeated George Washington's troops. This led to the British occupying New York City for seven years (Mount Vernon). 
    I have found several renditions of this artwork, with varying color combinations which I can only assume is due to it being printed by different presses. Red seems to be a very prominent color in all of them however, I have been unsuccessful in finding the reasoning behind this since the scene was before the invasion of the British. Perhaps it was simply used to draw attention to multiple points of view as it has been used throughout the history of art, though this is just a guess.
    The scene shows a busy harbor, alive with men and women in rowboats, construction on a large trade ship, and even horses loading goods. This was a very important port to control during the war, as it was one of the largest ports in the colonies. New York City became the central base for British troops during the revolution, which led to thousands of soldiers and Loyalists flooding the city. Unfortunately, this ultimately led to overcrowding and hunger, causing British forces to house captured rebels in prison ships in the harbor (Bowery Boys History).
    Since this work of art was created before the invasion, it does not elicit feelings of overcrowding and hunger, but instead shows how New York City was thriving with commerce in the early 1700s. It is inspiring as it shows men hard at work, building up a great city. I would not own a copy of this piece, but since it is an engraving and not a painting, I would very much like to see it in person in a museum in New York,



George Washington at the Battle of Princeton, Charles Wilson Peale, 1779-1781. Painted in Philadelphia, PA

    Another Pennsylvania artist, Charles Wilson Peale created this painting for the State of Pennsylvania to commemorate the victories of the Continental Army in New Jersey. The Battles of Princeton and Trenton were turning points in the war (Reenact Mag). George Washington and his troops crossed the Delaware River on Christmas 1776. They defeated British troops at Trenton the following day, then a week later on January 3rd won the Battle of Princeton (History). These battles were in response to the British force's attack in Manhattan in November 1776, taking 2,000 Continental soldiers prisoner. The battles were a great accomplishment, showing Washington could unite soldiers from different colonies to fight the war (History). 
    The State of Pennsylvania commissioned this piece, thinking it would inspire young men to "do what is right for the nation" and prompt positive social change (Reenact Mag). They were right in their thinking, as the painting's popularity created the demand for many replicas, and copies were sold across the colonies. 
    George Washington stands tall as the focal point of the painting. The American flag soars above his head to the right, with flags from the British forces bundled at his feet. In the background, you can see British troops being taken prisoner and led off the battlefield (Yale Art Gallery). Washington is portrayed as relaxed, yet stoic in demeanor with his hand placed upon the British general's canon. I especially enjoy the fact that despite just engaging in battle, General Washington is neatly put together. Would I own a copy of this painting? Probably not, but I do appreciate the history behind it.




Bibliography:







7 Paintings that Define the Revolutionary War - Re-enact: Lifestyle, History, War Stories, and Events for Re-enactment Enthusiasts (reenactmag.com)

Battles of Trenton and Princeton - Facts, Location & Importance - HISTORY

Saturday, June 18, 2022

Baroque Analysis

The Laughing Violinist by Gerrit Van Honthorst 1624, the Netherlands (Sothebys).


    When searching for Renaissance art last week, I stumbled upon this painting by Honthorst. I smiled and my spirit lifted as soon as I saw it. I soon realized that it was in fact not a product of the Renaissance but made a mental note to use it for our Baroque assignment. The warmness of the subject's face, the dramatic expression, and the brightness in his eyes make an instant connection with the viewer. Since the Renaissance, music in art was associated with love, or sex (Jeeves) and that seems to play a big role in this particular piece. The gesture with his arms suggests something vulgar or sexual in nature, with his focus on an audience of his joke who is out of view in the portrait. 

     Honthorst was Dutch but traveled to Italy to study Caravaggio, who influenced his work quite drastically (Visual Art Corks 1). He also used the methods of his teacher, like illumination by portraying artificial light. They both used paint to show shadows and bring light into the scene to create a sense of realism. He was regarded as the artist who brought this new style of art to the Netherlands (Sothebys). Honthorst created genre paintings, and The Laughing Violinist is one of several in a series portraying emotional musicians. While searching for articles on the painting, it was often confused for another more popular painting of his titled The Happy Violinist. The thing I like most about this particular piece of the series (The Laughing Violinist) is that you can almost hear his laughter, and I giggle at trying to guess what he's suggesting. 

    Baroque artists were controversial throughout Europe, especially in Italy. In 1517 the Protestant Reformation began with Martin Luther nailing the 95-point manifesto on the door of the All Saints Church in Germany (Visual Art Corks 2). This eventually led to the Catholics forming the Council of Trent in 1545. This emphasized the differences between Protestant and Catholic art. Protestant art often depicted common people in everyday scenes. They avoided large biblical scenes such as the crucifixion, images of saints, and paintings of the clergy, whereas Catholic artists frequently painted these scenes. Honthorst's genre paintings were exactly what the Catholics didn't want. 

    I really enjoy the dark values used in the background to give form to the subject. This plays perfectly with the lighter paints used to show light and shadows within the portrait. I also noticed a slight movement in the painting, with the sleeve of his undershirt poking up out of the top of his sleeve, and the wrinkles in the fabric near his elbow crease, suggesting he is moving his left arm up while pulling down with his right hand.

    I think my favorite element about this piece though is the color. The bold blue and bright gold really catch your eye and make the painting stand out. I think the dark background truly showcases the figure in the portrait, while the clothing color choices make him seem approachable (blue), yet excessive (gold). I would love to own a copy of this and would most likely put it in a dining or lounge area, keeping with the social feel.



Bibliography:

(#31) Gerrit van Honthorst (sothebys.com)

Gerrit van Honthorst: Genre-Painter, Utrecht School, Follower of Caravaggio (visual-arts-cork.com) 

The Serious and the Smirk: The Smile in Portraiture – The Public Domain Review (jeeves)

Protestant Reformation Art: Characteristics, History (visual-arts-cork.com)


Thursday, June 9, 2022

Renaissance Art Analysis

Primavera by Sandro Botticelli c.1480


    Sandro Botticelli created the painting titled Primavera between 1470 and 1480 in Italy, though the exact location is unclear (Wikipedia). Primavera is an Italian word meaning Spring, which becomes obvious as you scan the painting, noticing the various flowers and plant life in bloom. There are at least 138 species of flowers that have been identified in the painting (Uffizi). The painting has a mixture of  mythological creatures, as well as the goddess Venus in the center. 

When looking at the painting from right to left, you can see the progression of spring with the winds blowing in, and fruit appearing on the trees. There is also a strong depiction of fertility among the female figures with seemingly pregnant bellies. Zephyrus, the god of the west wind who is painted in blue tones, is embracing a Nymph named Chloris who then transforms into Flora, the goddess of spring (Uffizi).

Venus is dressed in a way suggesting marriage, with a modest hairstyle and attire.  Venus has in her company the Three Graces, Pleasure, Chastity, and Beauty who are holding hands and dressed in sheer clothing (Wide Walls 2020). One of the Graces is being shot at with an arrow by a blindfolded cupid. To the far left, we can see Mercury who is the messenger of the gods donning his winged sandals. He is also known as the god of May, while Venus is known as the goddess of April, further suggesting the progression of spring. 

This artwork was part of a collection found hung in the house of Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco de Medici who was a cousin of Lorenzo the Magnificent. This is not surprising, since it is rumored to have been a present for his wedding in 1482, though this has not been confirmed (Wikipedia). Historians link symbols in the artwork to the Medici family such as the orange groves which are found on the family crest, laurel trees, and flames on the clothing of Mercury and Venus which is a symbol of medicine.

The art now hangs in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence, Italy. While I do enjoy this painting and am intrigued by the mythology captured in it, I do not believe I would own a copy. I'd love to see it in person, hanging in a gallery since it is quite a large piece. I love the warm tones of the figures and the soft flow of fabrics. The dark contrasting background keeps your eyes focused on the details of the figures and gives dimension to the piece. Primavera is truly a Renaissance work of art with its characteristics of being privately owned, having a non-religious theme, the depth of the painting, and a depiction of the rebirth of naturalism.

  


Bibliography:

Wikipedia Primavera (Botticelli) - Wikipedia

The Uffizi Gallery Spring by Botticelli | Artworks | Uffizi Galleries

Wide Walls What You Need To Know About Botticelli’s Primavera | Widewalls


Non-Western Art: Saudi Arabia

Wall painting by Fatimah Faye'e Alalmai, Saudi Arabia, 2016             Al-Qatt Al-Asiri  is an ancient art form in the Asiri, or southe...